Many photo editing tools now offer a feature for automated replacement of the sky in an image. I initially had very little interest in this tool but I eventually decided to experiment with it. I have, at times, played a few tricks with the sky in an image to make it more dramatic but seldom as extreme as replacing the entire sky. And when I have tried to replace the entire sky in Photoshop, my result were comical at best. So, I decided to play around with this feature for my amusement.
There is actually quite a lot of debate about this tool. Many are very opposed to it and see it as deceitful and an affront to legitimate photography. Others see it as artistic technique to create an image. I am kind of in the middle on this. If I can make a beautiful picture to use as artwork, I don’t really see a problem with it. I would never attempt to claim that it wasn’t modified in this way. When you get down to it, no photo is pure and unedited. Just the act of selecting the lens, aperture, shutter speed, and lighting dramatically affects the look of the image and people don’t seem to be up in arms about that. So, decide for yourself.
When deciding what to edit, my first thought was of some photos that I took at Caprock Canyon State Park in 2018. I really enjoyed the colorful earthy cliffs, but it was a clear blue sky day and I thought my pictures suffered for that. So I grabbed one of those images and threw it into Photoshop and started playing.

In Photoshop you can chose from white puffy daytime clouds, high wispy clouds, dramatic stormy clouds, sunsets, and sunrises among the built-in skies. This image is clearly a sunny daytime image and so would really only look natural with sunny daytime clouds. So I selected one of those skies and adjusted the brightness and how it faded into the original sky and below is my result after playing around for about two minutes.

For me to do this manually would have been an hour of work and it would have looked like crap. The automatic masking in Photoshop worked quite well with this image and the sky blends in nicely in my opinion. If I had never seen this image, I would probably not suspect the sky replacement unless I really studied it. In hindsight, I might have reversed the clouds so that the shadow directions more closely match the shadows on the rocks, but I figured this out later and didn’t bother rebuilding this after I had already flattened and exported it.
Next I thought about pictures of downtown Austin. Unfortunately most of my downtown photos feature reflective water and it becomes apparent that the sky has been faked, I know there are blending techniques that can make this work a bit, but that is beyond my current Photoshop skill level and sounds a lot like too much work to me. But I did have an old picture of the state capital building at sunrise on a cloudless morning.

I opened this in Photoshop and selected a colorful sunrise sky. The light direction was initially opposite to that on the building so I reversed it. I also did a bit of work making the sky colors go with the landscape.

I don’t know if the above photo would fool you. I think that the side-lighting on the building may not quite go with the darker more colorful clouds above. I am not sure about that, what do you think?
And lastly there is The Window, which is a nice place in Big Bend National Park to see a sunset. Every sunset I have seen there has been cloudless and dusty. And while that made for a nice color gradient, I would like to have seen a more dramatic sunset sky behind The Window. See the image below of a sunset at The Window on a mostly cloudless evening.

After about two or three minutes in Photoshop I had the below sunset through The Window.

So, that is my very basic experimentation with sky replacement in Photoshop. I am sure that a more skilled photo editor could have done a better job, but I think the results were OK. Perhaps in the future when I see a beautiful sky but no real landscape to put under it, I can just take a photo of the sky and add that in to another photo later. I will be open about this if I do it.

What do you think about all of this?
Talk about blue-sky thinking. It’s amazing what you can do with technology, for special effects. I think over the capitol it would be fun to see a bunch of UFOs. Or, since it’s Texas, some flying Longhorn steers. A tornado touching down over downtown Austin might look cool, although perhaps too realistic for comfort. But I can see how it would be a lot of fun to play around with sky replacement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I would only use it for a specific need. Most of the fun is capturing the real scene for me I think.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I agree. For a few shits and grins, special effects can be fun. But reality can pose the biggest challenges and rewards, in the long run.
LikeLiked by 1 person
that is such a cool feature; it can dramatically change a photo, as it did with the few you showed. as long as the photographer indicates that the photo has been edited, I don’t see a problem…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wow! Your “Window” picture was always one of my favorites and now you made it look stunning with the sky. I would say that you did much more than an “OK” job with using this feature! I don’t see anything wrong with using the feature. Its like the fictional side of photography. As long as you state that you used it when displaying a certain photo, I think its fine. Like me indicating that my stories are fictional, just in case anyone would try to shake a cowbell sometime and wonder why they aren’t going anywhere. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well thanks for the compliment. Photoshop did most of the work there.
I have one of the Window pictures framed and was hung on my wall before the painting of the house. It will go on the next wall.
LikeLike
You are very welcome and that is a great picture to have framed!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was wondering if your stories of Betsy were based on some real world experiences with a special cow.
LikeLike
That would be cool if they were but no. I was around horses when younger but no cows. Just the cows that I would pass on the road while driving. 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
Did the cows stick to the right hand lane so you could get around them?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Haha!! Yes
LikeLike
And if you may remember I was never planning on having a cow play such a prominent role in my stories. Then someone kept saying that there was something special about Betsy…and….well… they may have been right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Impressive results. Do you need a “clean” line between the ground and sky for this to work properly or can it work round obstructions? ( It seems to have handled the Austin skyline quite well )
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you look through the columns on the capital dome, it didn’t quite fill in every gap. I suppose you could go tweak the mask.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Those are amazing. I would never suspect the capital photo. The sky in the background, in my opinion, makes or breaks the photo.
LikeLiked by 1 person